23 Jul
2013
23 Jul
'13
10:43 a.m.
doesn't the fact that there are no error bars on their projections tell you they need a little more nate silver, and a little less omg? ps. the underlying data they used has error bars: eg., the UN fertility rate for Angola in 2050 has a 95% confidence interval of being between 1.8 and 5. not a tight bound. On Jul 23, 2013, at 9:58 AM, Gaetano Borriello wrote:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2013/07/16/the-amazing-sur... _______________________________________________ change mailing list change@change.washington.edu http://changemm.cs.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/change